Live prices are currently unavailable — the exchange feed could not be reached and no recent cached reading is held.

Research · Ethereum

Bitcoin and Ethereum, compared on their own terms

Ethereum is the network Bitcoin is most often measured against, and the comparison is usually made badly — a single scoreboard applied to two systems built against different constraints. This sub-hub collects the pages that make the comparison properly: the monetary models each network actually specifies, the consensus mechanisms that secure them, and the design intents each was built to serve. Every claim is drawn from the networks' own documentation rather than from commentary.

The two networks are close enough in age and ambition that they invite direct comparison, and different enough in design that most of those comparisons mislead. Bitcoin's supply rule is fixed in the protocol and changes only through a consensus upgrade that every node must adopt; Ethereum's supply is a managed quantity, adjusted through protocol changes and the fee-burning mechanism introduced with EIP-1559. Neither arrangement is a failure of the other. They are answers to different questions about what a monetary network should optimise for.

The pages below state the window and the source behind every figure, and they mark clearly where a mechanism is proposed rather than deployed. Nothing here is a forecast, and no comparison is a recommendation. Where a calculation would genuinely help, the writing points to a tool that does that work properly rather than embedding a calculator in the reference material.

Monetary Models

Monetary Models

Bitcoin's issuance is fixed by a rule that no participant can change unilaterally; Ethereum's supply is managed through protocol updates and fee burning. These pages set the two arrangements side by side and cite each network's own specification for every claim.

Consensus and Design

Consensus and Design

Proof of work and proof of stake make rewriting history expensive in different ways, and each assumes something different about the participants securing it. The pages here work through what each mechanism buys and what it gives up.

Execution Mechanics

Execution Mechanics

Ethereum's execution layer is an account-based state machine with a metered virtual machine on top of it. These pages work through the account model, the machine itself, the fee market, the transaction format and the contract patterns that follow from all four.

Consensus Mechanics

Consensus Mechanics

Ethereum's consensus layer is a separate chain with its own registry, its own time structure and its own penalties. These pages cover the beacon chain, the duties a validator performs, what those duties earn, what slashing punishes, and how a checkpoint becomes final.

Scaling and Block Space

Scaling and Block Space

Ethereum's base layer is deliberately expensive, and the work of scaling happens above it. These pages cover the rollup model, the blob space that carries rollup data, the sequencers that order it, the state that every node must carry, and the market that has grown up around ordering blocks.

The reference pages behind the comparison

The pages above explain the comparison. These hold the underlying record and the methodology, for when you want to check a figure or follow a source.