Cycles & Supply
Issuance and supply growth over time
2009-2024Source: Bitcoin block chain records; protocol subsidy scheduleAnnual issuance assumes 52,560 blocks per year at the ten-minute target.
First epoch issuance
2,628,000 BTC
Per year at the initial reward
Current issuance
2,628,000 BTC
Epoch 1
Current supply growth
—
Annual issuance over circulating supply
Issuance and growth by epoch
The annual issuance column is the block reward multiplied by the 52,560 blocks the network targets in a year. The supply-growth column divides that figure by the supply already in circulation when the epoch began, which is the rate at which the existing stock is being diluted. The two columns fall together, but the growth rate falls faster, because the supply base it is measured against keeps growing while the issuance keeps halving.
| Epoch | Began | Block reward | Annual issuance | Supply at start | Supply growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 January 2009 | 50 BTC | 2,628,000 BTC | — | First epoch |
2009-2024Source: Bitcoin block chain records; protocol subsidy schedule
Issuance is not inflation. Issuance is the number of new coins created in a period. Supply growth is that number divided by the coins already in circulation. The two are often used interchangeably in commentary, and they are not the same: the first epoch issued roughly 2.6 million coins a year against a supply that began at zero, while the current epoch issues a little over 160,000 against a supply approaching twenty million. The issuance figure has fallen by more than ninety per cent; the growth rate has fallen by more than ninety-nine. The growth rate is the one that describes dilution.
What the decline means, and what it does not
The supply-growth rate is the closest thing Bitcoin has to an inflation figure, and it has fallen below that of every major currency. That is a real property of the design and it is worth stating plainly. It is also worth being precise about what follows from it. A declining growth rate means the stock of bitcoin is becoming scarcer relative to its own history. It does not mean the price must rise, because the price is set by demand as well as supply, and the schedule says nothing about demand.
There is a second subtlety. The halving reduces issuance in steps rather than gradually, so the growth rate does not decline smoothly. It drops sharply at each halving and then drifts down within the epoch as the supply base grows. A reader looking at a chart of supply growth will see a staircase rather than a slope, and the steps are the halvings. The halving history page documents the events that produce the steps.
The final consideration is the one most often overlooked. As issuance approaches zero, miners will depend increasingly on transaction fees rather than the block reward. Whether fee revenue can sustain the network's security budget is an open question, and it is not one this page can answer. What the table shows is the schedule as written; what happens to miner economics as the subsidy fades is a matter of projection rather than record. The supply schedule page sets out the cumulative figures behind these rates.
Related reading
- HalvingsEvery block-subsidy halving and what it did to issuance.
- CyclesExpansion and contraction phases across Bitcoin's history.
- MilestonesThe events that shaped Bitcoin, in chronological order.
- Cycle ComparisonCompleted cycles set side by side: advance, decline and duration.
- Performance Around HalvingsWhat the price did before and after each block-subsidy halving.
- Supply ScheduleHow the subsidy halves, and how issuance converges on 21 million.