Research · Altcoins
What beta to Bitcoin means for an alt
Last reviewed 2026-09-21Source: Methodology description; CoinGecko and Coin Metrics daily price seriesNo beta value is reported on this page. Any figure would need its window, reference and return convention stated.
What beta measures
Beta is the slope of a regression of one asset's returns on another's. A beta of one means the asset has tended to move by the same percentage as the reference; a beta above one means it has moved by more; a beta below one means it has moved by less. It is a scale-dependent measure, which is what distinguishes it from correlation: correlation describes how tightly two series move together, and beta describes how much.
The reference matters. Beta is always measured against something, and in this cluster the reference is bitcoin's daily log return. A beta quoted without its reference is not a defined quantity. The window matters just as much: a beta estimated over a year and a beta estimated over a quarter are different statistics, and they can disagree in sign.
Beta is also not a property of the asset in the way its supply schedule is. It is an estimate from a sample of returns, and it changes as the sample changes. Treating it as a fixed characteristic is the most common error in how it is used.
How it is estimated
| Choice | Convention used here | Effect on the estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Reference series | Bitcoin daily log return | A different reference produces a different beta; the number is meaningless without it |
| Return convention | Natural log of consecutive daily closes | Simple percentage returns give a slightly different slope, most visibly on large-move days |
| Window | Stated explicitly with every figure | Short windows track regime change but are noisy; long windows are stable but average across regimes |
| Frequency | Daily | Weekly or monthly returns reduce noise but discard the intraday behaviour that matters in stress |
Last reviewed 2026-09-21Source: Methodology descriptionThe conventions are stated so a figure can be reproduced; no estimate is reported here.
Why one beta hides regime change
A regression produces one slope for the whole sample, and that slope is an average. If an asset tracked bitcoin closely for most of the window and then decoupled for a month, the single beta describes neither period: it is a weighted blend of the two. The number is arithmetically correct and descriptively misleading.
The problem is worst in exactly the conditions where a reader most wants the estimate. Sensitivity to a shared factor is not constant; it tends to rise when the factor moves sharply, because the same selling pressure hits every asset in the complex at once. A beta estimated over a calm window therefore understates the sensitivity that applies during a stress event, and a beta estimated over a stressed window overstates the sensitivity that applies in calm conditions.
The practical response is to report beta as a rolling series rather than a single number, and to state the window. A rolling beta shows when the relationship changed, which is the information a single coefficient destroys. Where a single figure is unavoidable, it should be accompanied by the window and by an explicit statement that the estimate is an average across whatever regimes the window contained.
Dataset, period, method and limitations
Dataset. Daily closing prices for bitcoin and for the non-bitcoin asset under comparison, from CoinGecko's historical price endpoint, with Coin Metrics community data as a cross-check. Aggregated closes across venues.
Period. The window actually used must be stated with any estimate. Because the large alts have different listing dates, a fixed calendar window implies a different number of observations for each asset, and that difference should be disclosed.
Method. Ordinary least squares of the asset's daily log return on bitcoin's daily log return, over a trailing window, recomputed at each date for a rolling series. No adjustment is made for non-synchronous closes, which biases the estimate downward for assets whose deepest market closes at a different hour.
Limitations. Beta is an average across the window and hides regime change. It is sensitive to outliers, and a single extreme day can move it materially on a short window. It assumes a linear relationship, which is a poor description of an asset that tracks bitcoin in calm markets and decouples in stress. And it is estimated against a reference that is itself volatile, so the estimate inherits bitcoin's own measurement error.
Sources and references
The estimation conventions follow standard practice in quantitative finance; the data sources are the aggregations used elsewhere on this site.
- Historical price data. CoinGecko, CoinGecko API documentation: the daily series used for both the asset and the reference.
- Cross-check series. Coin Metrics, Community Network Data: independent daily reference rates.
- Beta and systematic risk. Sharpe, W., "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk", Journal of Finance, 1964: the original definition of beta as sensitivity to a systematic factor.
- How correlation differs from beta. Bitcoin Data Guide, How BTC–alt correlation is measured: the companion measure and why the two are not interchangeable.
Related reading
- Research HubEvery dataset on the site, with methodology and provenance.
- Altcoin ResearchAltcoins measured against Bitcoin: design intent, consensus, execution, scaling and market structure.
- The ETH-BTC Correlation RecordHow the correlation is measured, how it behaves across windows, and where it breaks down.
- The ETH/BTC RatioWhat the ratio measures, how to read its trend, and why it is not a forecast.
- ETH During Bitcoin Bull PhasesAssociation within a common market factor, and what co-movement cannot establish.
- ETH During Bitcoin Bear PhasesDrawdown depth and duration compared over identical windows, and the limits of the comparison.