Live prices are currently unavailable — the exchange feed could not be reached and no recent cached reading is held.

History

What happened after each all-time high

Buying at a peak is the worst timing the record contains, and this page measures what that timing produced. Each row is one high, the next high that eventually exceeded it, and the interval a holder spent underwater in between.

2010-2025Source: Coinbase Exchange daily candles; Bitstamp and CoinDesk historical series for 2010-2014Peaks are closing-price highs on the daily record.

Peaks recorded

0

Distinct closing highs since 2010

Eventually exceeded

0

Peaks a later high has since passed

Still the high

0

Peaks not yet exceeded

The record after each peak

The wait column measures the interval from the peak to the next high that exceeded it, which is the time a holder who bought at the top spent below their entry price. It is not the same as the recovery duration published on the recovery time page, because that series is built from the drawdown episodes rather than from the peak sequence. The two agree on the broad shape and differ in the episodes they include.

Each Bitcoin all-time high with the next high that exceeded it, the price at that high, the interval spent below the peak and whether the peak has been exceeded.
Peak datePeak priceNext highNext high priceTime below peakOutcome
No records are available for this dataset.

2010-2025Source: Coinbase Exchange daily candles; Bitstamp and CoinDesk historical series for 2010-2014

What this table measures. The forward horizon here is the interval to the next all-time high, not a fixed window such as one or two years. That choice is deliberate: a fixed window would require a price for every peak at the same offset, and the most recent peaks do not have one. Measuring to the next high uses only prices that exist in the record, and it answers the question a holder at the top actually asks — how long until the market made a new high.

The worst timing in the record

Buying at an all-time high is the least favourable entry the record contains, and the table shows what it produced. Every peak except the most recent was eventually exceeded, and the interval required was measured in years rather than months. A holder who bought at the top of one cycle and needed the money before the next one arrived did not recover, and the table cannot show how many such holders there were because it only records prices.

The pattern across the rows is worth noting. The earliest peaks were exceeded relatively quickly, because the market was small and a modest inflow could lift it past any previous level. The later peaks took longer, and the intervals have not shortened as the market has grown. That is the same compression of upside and persistence of downside that appears throughout the record, seen from the perspective of the worst possible entry point.

The most important caveat is the one that applies to every historical maximum. The fact that every past peak was eventually exceeded is a statement about the past, and the sample is small. It is not a guarantee that the current peak will be exceeded, and the table should not be read as one. What it does support is a narrower and more useful conclusion: buying at a peak has historically required patience measured in years, and any plan that assumes otherwise is assuming something the record does not show.

The all-time high history page lists the peaks themselves, and the drawdown record measures how far the price fell after each one.